Welcome,  Guest Log in
Posted July 20, 2010

Intraoperative cell salvage effective, cost-efficient alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in trauma patients 

BrownCVR. Arch Surg. 2010;145:690-694.

Print Print Email Email Discuss in our forum Discuss in our forum

Intraoperative cell salvage — a process in which shed blood is collected and processed so red blood cells may be transfused back into a patient — led to fewer transfusions and was a safe and cost-effective alternative to allogeneic blood transfusion in trauma patients undergoing emergency surgery, according to findings from a retrospective matched cohort study.

From 2006 to 2007, researchers examined 47 patients in a level I trauma center at the University Medical Center Brackenridge, in Austin, Texas. Patients underwent an urgent operative intervention and received intraoperative cell salvage and autologous blood transfusion. These patients were compared with 47 sex- and age-matched patients who underwent similar procedures but received allogeneic blood transfusion without cell salvage.

Thirty-nine patients underwent laparotomy, two underwent thoracotomy and nine underwent orthopedic procedures.

Compared with an intraoperative blood loss of 978 mL in patients who did not receive intraoperative cell salvage, patients who received cell salvage had an average intraoperative blood loss of 1,795 mL but received an average return of 819 mL of their own blood (P<.001).

Moreover, patients who received cell salvage had fewer intraoperative and total units of allogeneic packed red blood cells when compared with patients who did not receive the procedure (2 units vs. 4 units during surgery and 4 units vs. 8 units total) and received less total units of plasma (3 units vs. 5 units).

Further, the cost of blood transfusion was significantly less in the group receiving the cell salvage procedure when compared with those who did not receive the procedure ($1,616 vs. $2,584; P=.004).

Similar average lengths of stay in the ICU (8 days for both) and in the hospital (18 days for the cell salvage group and 20 for the comparison group) were observed between the two groups. No difference was observed in mortality (13% cell salvage group vs. 21% comparison group).

The researchers recommend for further studies to “definitively confirm the safety of transfusing contaminated blood, to preoperatively identify patients who would most benefit from autologous transfusion and to optimize cost-effectiveness. In the meantime, centers with access to a cell salvage program should routinely use autologous transfusion as part of their intraoperative resuscitation. More important, centers not currently using intraoperative cell salvage and autotransfusion should identify and overcome barriers to implementing this life-saving technique.”

Twitter Follow HemOncToday.com on Twitter.

There are no comments. Be the first to comment.

Your comment

Name:
Comments:

HemOncToday.com is intended for physician use.
All comments will be posted at the discretion of the editors.
We reserve the right not to post any comments with unsolicited information about drugs or other products, and at no time will the HemOncToday.com web site be used for medical advice to patients.

Volume 11   Number 16
Current Print Issue